Social wellbeing
To get a sense of the level of wellbeing in New
Zealand and how it has changed over time, we first need to
identify what is meant by the notion of wellbeing.
"Wellbeing", in the context of this report, means those
aspects of life that society collectively agrees are important for a
person’s happiness, quality of life and welfare.
Many of the constituent components of wellbeing will be common
to all New Zealanders. For example, Professor Mason Durie, Assistant
Vice-Chancellor (Māori) and Professor of Māori Research and
Development, Massey University, has noted that important outcomes for
Māori are likely to include outcomes relevant to the rest of society
such as good health and a high standard of living.1 However, the needs and
aspirations of different people and communities will also vary in
important ways. For example, for people who get comfort and strength
from their religion, an important outcome could be spiritual wellbeing,
and this might mean having access to a place of worship. The social
report focuses on those aspects of wellbeing most people hold in
common.
The New Zealand Royal Commission on Social Policy (1988)
is a useful source of research on what New Zealanders agree constitutes
wellbeing and a decent quality of life. The Commission concluded that:
[New Zealanders] have said that they need a sound base of
material support including housing, health, education and worthwhile
work. A good society is one which allows people to be heard, to have a
say in their future, and choices in life ... [they] value an atmosphere
of community responsibility and an environment of security. For them,
social wellbeing includes that sense of belonging that affirms their
dignity and identity and allows them to function in their everyday
roles.2
The Social Report 2006 identifies 10 discrete
components of wellbeing. We refer to these components as "desired
social outcomes", and these are listed in Table IN1.
Nine of these domains were used in the prototype The Social Report
2001. A number of changes were made to these domains in subsequent
reports as a result of stakeholder consultation on the content of the
report in 2002. The most significant amendment was the addition of a
new leisure and recreation domain in the 2004 report. We have not made
any changes this year to the outcomes framework.
The outcome domains are interconnected. Doing well or poorly
in one domain is often likely to impact upon performance in another
outcome domain. For example, participation in leisure and recreation is
a good thing in itself, but it may also lead to improved physical and
mental health, and better social networks.
|