Economic Standard of Living
Desired outcomes
New Zealand is a prosperous society, reflecting the value of both paid and unpaid work.
All people have access to adequate incomes and decent, affordable housing
that meets their needs. With an adequate standard of living, people are
well-placed
to participate fully in society and to exercise choice about how to live
their lives.
Introduction
Economic standard of living concerns the physical circumstances in which
people live, the goods and services they are able to consume and the economic
resources they have access to. It is concerned with both the average level
of resources in New Zealand as well as the distribution of those resources across New Zealand society.
Basic necessities such as adequate food, clothing and housing are fundamental
to wellbeing. The 1972 Royal Commission on Social Security agreed that a useful
standard for adequacy was a level of resources that allowed individuals not
just to survive but also to participate. They defined participation as meaning "no-one is ... so poor that they cannot eat the sort of food that New Zealanders
usually eat, wear the same sort of clothes, [and] take a moderate part in those
activities which the ordinary New Zealander takes part in as a matter of course".52
The desired outcome statement points to the importance of not only everyone
enjoying a decent standard of living, but also of our society being as prosperous
as possible. Such prosperity gives people choice over how to live their lives.
Indicators
Six indicators are used in this chapter, each providing
information on different aspects of economic standards of living. They are:
market income per person, income inequality, the population with low incomes,
the population with low living standards, housing affordability and household
crowding.
The focus is largely on objective measures of economic living standards,
though one indicator (the population with low living standards) takes into
account people’s subjective perceptions about how well off they are. Together,
the indicators provide information about overall trends in living standards,
levels of hardship and how equitably resources are distributed. All are relevant
to the adequacy of people’s incomes and their ability to participate in society
and make choices about their lives.
The focus of the first three is on incomes, while the remaining three
are more direct measures of the material living standards people can achieve.
This recognises that the same level of income can produce different living
standards, depending on factors such as people’s coping skills, their health
status and the assets they own.
Market income per person gives an indication of the average level of income
and therefore the overall material quality of life available to New Zealanders.
This is an internationally recognised measure, allowing comparisons between
New Zealand and other nations. An estimate of the economic value of unpaid
work is also provided.
Income inequality is measured by comparing the incomes of the top 20 percent
of households with the incomes of the bottom 20 percent. High levels of inequality
are associated with lower levels of social cohesion and personal wellbeing,
even when less well-off people have adequate incomes to meet their basic needs.
The proportion of the population with low incomes also provides information
about how equitably resources are distributed and how many people are likely
to be on incomes that do not allow full participation in society.
The population with low living standards takes into account the extent
people do without things and do not engage in social activities because of
the cost, as well as measuring whether people feel their incomes are satisfactory.
Housing affordability measures the proportion of the population spending
more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Housing costs have a major
impact on overall material living standards.
The final indicator measures the number of people living in overcrowded
houses. Housing is a basic need, and this indicator provides a direct measure
of the adequacy of housing people can afford.
|